regulation and policy – having the desired effect?
This is hot off the press from my friends at Bob’s Guide (a great daily newsletter). It would appear that some US institutions are willing to do almost anything to get the government out of their board rooms – well, it was only a matter of time - particularly after the government created legislation to limit remuneration in that same board room…
Banks ‘rush to repay Tarp funds’ as rates investigation looms
16 April 2009
US retail banks are scrambling to repay bailout funds they received under the taxpayer-funded Troubled Asset Relief Program (Tarp) in order to free themselves of the restrictions imposed by the scheme, it has been reported. Goldman Sachs became the first institution to move towards paying back its $10 billion bailout when it announced a share issue for private investors designed to raise $5 billion.   ÂAccording to the Guardian, Bank of America and JP Morgan are also keen to get the government out of their boardrooms by paying back their emergency loans.Â
A total of $310 billion was paid out to top US banks under Tarp. Banks will only be allowed to pay their loans back if they pass ‘stress tests’ currently being carried out by the Treasury.Â
In other news, banks that received bailout funding are to face an investigation over “hikes” in their interest rates, fees and customer penalties, the Independent reports.Â
Elizabeth Warren, the Congressional appointee overseeing Tarp, said her report would look at whether the higher charges meant taxpayers are effectively “paying twice” to support the financial sector.Â
Fueling this debate are news stories like the following video from Al Jazeera’s John Terrett, reporting from New York…
This  should generate some hot debate – nothing like a little controversy to fuel the water-cooler talk!